CT guided percutaneous drainage is one form of image-guided drainage, allowing minimally invasive treatment of collections, potentially anywhere in the body. Although less commonly used than ultrasound guidance, it is particularly valuable in gaining access to deeper or more posterior parts of the body.
It has several advantages and disadvantages over ultrasound, which include:
- can safely access areas not well visualized on ultrasound
- vision is not obscured by gas
- better vision in larger patients
- is less user dependent for those less confident with ultrasound guided procedures
- the CT table in some ways offers more stable positioning for the patient
- in the intubated patient it allows for better monitoring and positioning of equipment
- is not truly dynamic like ultrasound, although CT fluoroscopy does allow near immediate imaging
- exposes the patient to ionizing radiation
- requires a wider range of staff to undertake compared to ultrasound
- harder in the uncooperative patient as movement, means access point lost
Interventional procedures like percutaneous drainage require special attention to coagulation indices. There are widely divergent opinions about the safe values of these indices for percutaneous biopsies. The values suggested below were considered based on the literature review, whose references are cited below:
- complete blood count
- platelet > 50000/mm3 (some institutions determine other values between 50000-100000/mm3) 2
- coagulation profile
- international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.5 2
- normal prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT)
- some studies showed that having a normal INR or prothrombin time is no reassurance that the patient will not bleed after the procedure 3
Review the diagnostic CT and other relevant imaging first to clarify the collection that is requested to be drained, and the shortest possible route without traversing important structures 1.
In some selected cases other anatomical structures are purposely traversed as part of the treatment, such as the stomach when undertaking pancreatic pseudocyst drainage.
The technique is largely the same as for ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage procedures, with either a single step or multistep technique, although the latter is more commonly used in CT. A two- or three-part access needle is used to enter the abscess/collection, followed by the use of a stiff wire and serial dilators, before a catheter is placed.
The patient's basic observations should be monitored for four hours (i.e. pulse, BP, SpO2).
The patient should remain in bed for two hours. After this mobilization is permissible as is being able to eat and drink.
The entry site should be reviewed on a daily basis. Once the output from the collection ceases, repeat imaging should be considered before removing the drainage catheter.
- 1. Haaga JR, Weinstein AJ. CT-guided percutaneous aspiration and drainage of abscesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;135 (6): 1187-94. AJR Am J Roentgenol (abstract) - Pubmed citation
- 2. Walker TG. Interventional Procedures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (2012) ISBN:1931884862. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 3. Gilmore IT, Burroughs A, Murray-Lyon IM et-al. Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London. Gut. 1995;36 (3): 437-41. Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
Related Radiopaedia articles
- procedure overview
- CT-guided biopsy
- CT-guided percutaneous drainage
- fine-needle aspiration (FNA)
- indirect arthrography
- percutaneous tumor ablation
- ultrasound-guided biopsy
- ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage
- procedure overview
- thyroid gland
- splenic interventions
spinal interventional procedures (general)
- epidural blood patch
- facet joint injection
- fluoroscopy-guided lumbar puncture
- sacroiliac joint injection
- spinal epidural injection
- transforaminal nerve root injection
- spinal interventional procedures (general)